
Successful dissemination and uptake of research evidence requires identifying the appropriate audience and tailoring messages via appropriate mediums. When planning research, it is critical to consider prospectively how findings will be disseminated and to be cognisant of this throughout the research process.

Fortunately, there are many opportunities for sharing new knowledge, not only by writing for journals or books, but also by using social media, speaking at conferences and other events about the research outcomes.
#Ways to disseminate project findings trial
Furthermore, the WHO states that clinical trial results be submitted for publication in a peer‐reviewed journal within 12 months of study completion (Moorthy et al. 2014), it is equally important to publish studies with negative or equivocal results for this reason. While there is a clear bias towards publication of positive response (Matosin et al. Moreover, the World Health Organization (WHO), in its position on Interventional Clinical Trial Results, states that it is unethical to conduct human research without publication and dissemination of the results of that research, as withholding results may subject future volunteers to unnecessary risk (Matosin et al. Consequently, researchers are obliged and required to share the findings of their project with others, regardless of the results. It is often conducted using public funds under the guise of the common good. Research involves considerable intellectual, time and financial commitments by researchers, participants and funding organisations.
#Ways to disseminate project findings professional
A research study is not complete until the study findings have been disseminated via presentations at professional forums and published in a peer‐reviewed journal and where appropriate recommendations regarding how the research findings could be translated into clinical practice are made. These examples are supported by a discussion of the supporting theories and evidence to maximise the opportunities and traction of the uptake of the evidence into practice.Ĭentral to nurse‐led research and knowledge translation is dissemination. Examples of nurse‐led research incorporating the principles of knowledge translation in their study design that have resulted in improvements in patient outcomes are provided. This is followed by practical, evidence‐informed suggestions to overcome the barriers and facilitate enablers of knowledge translation. We discuss the importance of disseminating research and explain the definition and role of knowledge translation within the knowledge‐to‐action cycle. The discussion is informed by the scientific literature around knowledge translation, implementation science and clinician behaviour change, and presented from the nurse clinician perspective. This is a practice paper that interprets the knowledge translation literature for clinicians interested in conducting translational research and translating robust research evidence into clinical practice. This practice paper aims to describe the importance of, and considerations for nurses to successfully disseminate and translate research into clinical practice.

With more nurses in the frontline of health care than any other healthcare profession, nurse‐led research is increasingly recognised as a critical pathway to practical, effective and cost‐effective ways of reducing hospital errors, cutting down on unnecessary costs and improving patient outcomes (World Health Organization 2012). In the United States, it is reported that <20% of what physicians do has solid research to support it (Kumar & Nash 2011). For example, in Australia, clinician compliance with providing appropriate care for 22 conditions in large nationwide cross‐sectional study ranged from 32–86% (Runciman et al. Although research evidence is being produced at an increasing rate, change in clinical practice to reflect this evidence has lagged behind (Kitson 2008, Benner et al.

The importance of robust scholarly research for quality, safe, effective and efficient care of patients and their families is well established (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 2009).
